This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients LambertDW, Rhamphoryncus, chemacortes, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2009-02-12.12:09:20
SpamBayes Score 0.0157056
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1234440604.7414.14.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1234429046.69.0.362401801997.issue5186@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Other than that, the patch looks fine to me;  x ^= x >> 4 would be fine  
> too.

I've just tried x ^= x >> 4 and the speedup is smaller on our
microbenchmark (time_object_hash.py). I conjecture that trying to
maintain the sequentiality of adresses may have beneficial cache
locality effects. Should we care?
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-12 12:09:21pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, jcea, chemacortes, mark.dickinson, Rhamphoryncus, LambertDW
2009-02-12 12:09:20pitroulinkissue5186 messages
2009-02-12 12:09:20pitroucreate