Message80695
Well, that would leave a function whose return *type* depends on the
*value* of one of the arguments, which I find very ugly.
I don't know why you think rounding an int to X (X>0) digits after the
decimal point should return a float -- it's not like the int has any
digits behind the point, so nothing is gained. Why would it be a lie? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-01-28 03:56:16 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, loewis, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, orsenthil, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, jyasskin, LambertDW, dingo |
2009-01-28 03:56:15 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1233114975.86.0.872865778403.issue4707@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-01-28 03:56:14 | gvanrossum | link | issue4707 messages |
2009-01-28 03:56:14 | gvanrossum | create | |
|