Author gvanrossum
Recipients LambertDW, ajaksu2, dingo, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, jyasskin, loewis, mark.dickinson, orsenthil, rhettinger
Date 2009-01-28.03:56:14
SpamBayes Score 0.00028267
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1233114975.86.0.872865778403.issue4707@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Well, that would leave a function whose return *type* depends on the
*value* of one of the arguments, which I find very ugly.

I don't know why you think rounding an int to X (X>0) digits after the
decimal point should return a float -- it's not like the int has any
digits behind the point, so nothing is gained. Why would it be a lie?
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-28 03:56:16gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, loewis, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, orsenthil, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, jyasskin, LambertDW, dingo
2009-01-28 03:56:15gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1233114975.86.0.872865778403.issue4707@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-28 03:56:14gvanrossumlinkissue4707 messages
2009-01-28 03:56:14gvanrossumcreate