Message80614
I already use the second version of the count function you give (without
default arguments which I am not a big fan of). I'm not saying its
difficult or unreadable to bypass itertools.count and write your own
enhanced count function. But if I use a custom count function, you use a
custom count function, and possibly many others too, then there could be
a common requirement for a step argument and it might be a good idea too
make it more widely available.
Haskell has a powerful and concise list notation, some of which Python
has already borrowed from:
multiple3 = [3,6..] |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-01-27 03:57:01 | steve21 | set | recipients:
+ steve21, rhettinger, LambertDW |
2009-01-27 03:57:01 | steve21 | set | messageid: <1233028621.62.0.725226010085.issue5032@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-01-27 03:56:59 | steve21 | link | issue5032 messages |
2009-01-27 03:56:59 | steve21 | create | |
|