Author loewis
Recipients benjamin.peterson, drkjam, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, shields
Date 2009-01-05.00:36:54
SpamBayes Score 0.00546243
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <49615624.8080401@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <8517e9350901041616y3b5dc334t4f91328d22090a46@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> I'm fine with this. But as Duncan mentioned, some guidance from the
> benevolent powers that be on what exactly they're looking for before
> we launch into a bunch of work would be appreciated.

I think Guido's original message summarizes that: a module that
fills a gap for address manipulations... In addition, it should
have all the organisational qualities (happy user base, determined
maintainers, copyright forms, documentation, tests). As to what
precisely its API should be - that is for the experts (i.e. you)
to determine. I personally think performance is important, in
addition to a well-designed, useful API. Conformance to PEP 8
is also desirable.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-05 00:36:56loewissetrecipients: + loewis, gvanrossum, exarkun, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, drkjam, oubiwann
2009-01-05 00:36:55loewislinkissue3959 messages
2009-01-05 00:36:54loewiscreate