This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ralph.corderoy
Recipients ajaksu2, alexandre.vassalotti, bboissin, blaisorblade, christian.heimes, djc, facundobatista, lemburg, pitrou, ralph.corderoy, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, theatrus
Date 2009-01-04.13:21:17
SpamBayes Score 0.0052940417
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1231075278.48.0.889978003572.issue4753@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Regarding compressing the opcode table to make better use of cache; 
what if the most frequently occurring opcodes where placed together,
e.g. the opcodes were ordered by frequency, most frequent first.  Just
based on a one-off static analysis of a body of code.  A level one cache
line can be, what, 64 bytes == 16 32-bit pointers.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-04 13:21:19ralph.corderoysetrecipients: + ralph.corderoy, lemburg, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, facundobatista, pitrou, christian.heimes, ajaksu2, alexandre.vassalotti, djc, bboissin, blaisorblade, theatrus
2009-01-04 13:21:18ralph.corderoysetmessageid: <1231075278.48.0.889978003572.issue4753@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-04 13:21:17ralph.corderoylinkissue4753 messages
2009-01-04 13:21:17ralph.corderoycreate