Author gpolo
Recipients brett.cannon, gpolo, wordtech
Date 2009-01-03.22:31:57
SpamBayes Score 9.01802e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <ac2200130901031431w47331099g455f065126c56a57@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1231021258.95.0.828601549163.issue2983@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Do you still need a review for this, Guilherme? If you just need a quick
> code check I can see if I can make the time for this, but my tkinter
> knowledge is lacking so it won't be very in-depth. Hopefully this is all
> isolated enough that even if it is initially broken it won't be a big
> deal if you just check it in.
>

I was waiting more for an "Ok, commit" as I though Fredrik already did
a quick code check on it.
But of course you can look at it too if you want.

Also, would it be fine to leave its tests on lib-tk (2.7) and tkinter (3.1) ?

> And do you want this in 2.7 and 3.1, or out of simplicity just 3.1?
>

I would like both if I can decide on that.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-03 22:31:58gpolosetrecipients: + gpolo, brett.cannon, wordtech
2009-01-03 22:31:57gpololinkissue2983 messages
2009-01-03 22:31:57gpolocreate