Message78423
> Perhaps the path of least resistance is to change PyObject_Hash to be
> yet another place where PyType_Ready will be called implicitly if it
> hasn't been called already?
I think that's the best thing to do. It would bring PyObject_Hash in
line with PyObject_Format, for example.
If we pick some other solution (instead of modifying PyObject_Hash),
then we should find all of the lazy calls to PyType_Ready (that exist to
solve this problem) and remove them. IOW, it should be handled the same
everywhere. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-12-28 17:33:20 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, gpolo, hagen |
2008-12-28 17:33:20 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1230485600.5.0.656149882555.issue4701@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2008-12-28 17:33:18 | eric.smith | link | issue4701 messages |
2008-12-28 17:33:18 | eric.smith | create | |
|