Author loewis
Recipients ebfe, georg.brandl, ggenellina, loewis
Date 2008-12-27.08:51:52
SpamBayes Score 0.00073996
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> I guess the phrase "you must not provide storage" is a failed
> translation and not meant like that. It should say "you are not required
> to provide storage". It's confusing to have such strong wording without
> reason.

It's stronger than "you are not required to": if you do provide storage
(by allocating memory), then this memory most likely will be garbage,
and you must not attempt to free it afterwards (as doing so would cause
a crash).
Date User Action Args
2008-12-27 08:51:53loewissetrecipients: + loewis, georg.brandl, ggenellina, ebfe
2008-12-27 08:51:52loewislinkissue4746 messages
2008-12-27 08:51:52loewiscreate