This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients gregory.p.smith, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach
Date 2008-12-18.23:43:56
SpamBayes Score 6.0323515e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1229643833.27526.5.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>
Hello again,

> Still, I think this patch does too much code duplication. There should
> be only a single function that does the optional untracking; this then
> gets called from multiple places.

The point was to avoid slowing down the critical path of tuple creation
in the most common cases. If it is considered too hackish, then I agree
the other patch (tuple+dictopts-alt.patch) should be considered instead.

By the way, perhaps pybench should grow a GC test (e.g. derived from
Greg's script). What do you think?
Date User Action Args
2008-12-18 23:43:58pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, stutzbach
2008-12-18 23:43:57pitroulinkissue4688 messages
2008-12-18 23:43:56pitroucreate