Message77870
On 2008-12-13 16:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> Here is a new patch without any dispatch shortcut in ceval.c, just
> optimizations in unicodeobject.c and longobject.c. Net result on pybench:
>
> Test minimum run-time average run-time
> this other diff this other
> diff
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CompareFloats: 166ms 170ms -2.3% 169ms 174ms
> -2.8%
> CompareFloatsIntegers: 230ms 231ms -0.7% 233ms 231ms
> +0.8%
> CompareIntegers: 247ms 270ms -8.7% 248ms 272ms
> -9.0%
> CompareInternedStrings: 196ms 254ms -22.7% 197ms 255ms
> -22.7%
> CompareLongs: 143ms 158ms -9.0% 143ms 158ms
> -9.3%
> CompareStrings: 156ms 168ms -7.4% 157ms 169ms
> -7.2%
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Totals: 1139ms 1252ms -9.1% 1148ms 1260ms
> -8.9%
>
>
> The patch seems fairly uncontroversial to me, I'll commit it soon if
> there's no opposition.
Why have you removed the complete error handling section in
PyUnicode_RichCompare() ?
> Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12341/cmps5.patch |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-12-15 14:41:26 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, rhettinger, pitrou |
2008-12-15 14:41:25 | lemburg | link | issue3106 messages |
2008-12-15 14:41:24 | lemburg | create | |
|