Message 76174 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	kristjan.jonsson
Recipients	kristjan.jonsson
Date	2008-11-21.10:52:52
SpamBayes Score	0.020267723
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1227264774.0.0.300756536942.issue4336@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Just a thought here: Maybe it would be better just to change socket._fileobject to always use a minimum of 8k readbuffer for readline() just as read() already does. The read() documentation states that recv(1) is very inefficient, and so it is. The intent, when calling makefile(bufsize=0) is probably to make sure that buffering for write() is disabled. Any thoughts?

Just a thought here:
Maybe it would be better just to change socket._fileobject to always 
use a minimum of 8k readbuffer for readline() just as read() already 
does.  The read() documentation states that recv(1) is very 
inefficient, and so it is.
The intent, when calling makefile(bufsize=0) is probably to make sure 
that buffering for write() is disabled.
Any thoughts?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-11-21 10:52:54	kristjan.jonsson	set	recipients: + kristjan.jonsson
2008-11-21 10:52:53	kristjan.jonsson	set	messageid: <1227264774.0.0.300756536942.issue4336@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-11-21 10:52:53	kristjan.jonsson	link	issue4336 messages
2008-11-21 10:52:52	kristjan.jonsson	create