Message75020
hi, i'm happy i got a response on this :)
anyway, can u elaborate on the "reason" y something like this was never
done?
yes, i kno the patch is rough right now (& will never get accepted in
its current state), but its now proven to work, & gives migrating
developers *something* to test their py3k_syntax code while *still*
maintaining compatibility w/ python2.x extension modules.
isn't that the spirit of python 2.7? in the meantime, i'm in no hurry
to have anything committed. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-10-21 06:56:21 | kaizhu | set | recipients:
+ kaizhu, gvanrossum, loewis, collinwinter, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson |
2008-10-21 06:56:20 | kaizhu | set | messageid: <1224572180.92.0.322664872779.issue3238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2008-10-21 06:56:20 | kaizhu | link | issue3238 messages |
2008-10-21 06:56:19 | kaizhu | create | |
|