This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients loewis, ronaldoussoren
Date 2008-10-07.20:13:29
SpamBayes Score 9.651509e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Somewhere along the way the calculation of the architecture string got 
> messed up, resulting in the current situation. That is, the current 
> situation is not as designed by the original author of the universal 
> binary support code.

Ok, what *is* the desired way of naming architectures on that system?
Is that documented somewhere?
Date User Action Args
2008-10-07 20:13:29loewissetrecipients: + loewis, ronaldoussoren
2008-10-07 20:13:29loewislinkissue4064 messages
2008-10-07 20:13:29loewiscreate