Author loewis
Recipients loewis, ronaldoussoren
Date 2008-10-07.20:13:29
SpamBayes Score 9.65151e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <48EBC2E7.7030500@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1223409177.13.0.996871973371.issue4064@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Somewhere along the way the calculation of the architecture string got 
> messed up, resulting in the current situation. That is, the current 
> situation is not as designed by the original author of the universal 
> binary support code.

Ok, what *is* the desired way of naming architectures on that system?
Is that documented somewhere?
History
Date User Action Args
2008-10-07 20:13:29loewissetrecipients: + loewis, ronaldoussoren
2008-10-07 20:13:29loewislinkissue4064 messages
2008-10-07 20:13:29loewiscreate