Message74477
> Somewhere along the way the calculation of the architecture string got
> messed up, resulting in the current situation. That is, the current
> situation is not as designed by the original author of the universal
> binary support code.
Ok, what *is* the desired way of naming architectures on that system?
Is that documented somewhere? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-10-07 20:13:29 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, ronaldoussoren |
2008-10-07 20:13:29 | loewis | link | issue4064 messages |
2008-10-07 20:13:29 | loewis | create | |
|