This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients ghaering, gregburd, gregory.p.smith, jcea, josiahcarlson, pitrou, rhettinger, skip.montanaro
Date 2008-09-12.00:25:32
SpamBayes Score 8.221166e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1221179131.9366.20.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <>
> Benchmarks to prove or disprove performance changes?

Agreed, benchmarks should be run.

> Subclasses to 
> offer different order by semantics (see the version I uploaded for an
> example)?

If you like, but "ordering semantics" is something which is just as
easily done in Python, so I don't understand the point of integrating it
in the dbm layer...

> Consistent behavior wrt dictionaries?

It sounds like an example of foolish consistency to me. The performance
characteristics are certainly too different to consider dbm.anything a
transparent replacement for standard dicts. And dbm.sqlite only accepts
strings, not the wide range of datatypes that dicts accept as keys and
values... so, given the big picture, I don't see why you care about such
a mostly pointless detail.
Date User Action Args
2008-09-12 00:26:07pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, jcea, ghaering, josiahcarlson, gregburd
2008-09-12 00:25:33pitroulinkissue3783 messages
2008-09-12 00:25:32pitroucreate