This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author skip.montanaro
Recipients barry, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, rhettinger, skip.montanaro
Date 2008-09-04.02:43:44
SpamBayes Score 0.000512991
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <18623.19290.526874.362918@montanaro-dyndns-org.local>
In-reply-to <1220490557.25.0.967235651994.issue3769@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Is there going to be a dbm.* module which is supported across all the core
platforms: Windows, Mac & Unix?  I don't count dumbdbm as really all that
useful, especially given the caveats listed in the module docstring.

If not, could a dbm.sqlite module be written for 2.7 and 3.1 which can fill
that role?

Skip
History
Date User Action Args
2008-09-04 02:43:45skip.montanarosetrecipients: + skip.montanaro, barry, brett.cannon, rhettinger, benjamin.peterson
2008-09-04 02:43:45skip.montanarolinkissue3769 messages
2008-09-04 02:43:44skip.montanarocreate