Message 70287 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	facundobatista, mark.dickinson, rhettinger
Date	2008-07-26.00:07:12
SpamBayes Score	0.0008187233
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1217030835.56.0.915023096223.issue3449@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
-1 on renaming. I concur with Mark that we are under no obligation to match the names used in the spec -- only the functionality matters -- also we're already got a history of at least slightly different names. I also see no reason to break existing code relying on the existing name. I also agree with Facundo that the "reduce" name has a completely unrelated association in the Python langauge.

-1 on renaming.  I concur with Mark that we are under no obligation to 
match the names used in the spec -- only the functionality matters -- 
also we're already got a history of at least slightly different names.  
I also see no reason to break existing code relying on the existing 
name.  I also agree with Facundo that the "reduce" name has a 
completely unrelated association in the Python langauge.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-26 00:07:16	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.000818723 -> 0.0008187233 recipients: + rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson
2008-07-26 00:07:15	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.000818723 -> 0.000818723 messageid: <1217030835.56.0.915023096223.issue3449@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-07-26 00:07:14	rhettinger	link	issue3449 messages
2008-07-26 00:07:13	rhettinger	create