➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mgiuca
Recipients loewis, mgiuca, orsenthil, thomaspinckney3
Date 2008-07-10.16:13:03
SpamBayes Score 0.0012417234
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1215706384.14.0.192659013615.issue3300@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Setting Version back to Python 3.0. Is there a reason it was set to
Python 3.1? This proposal will certainly break a lot of code. It's *far*
better to do it in the big backwards-incompatible Python 3.0 release
than a later release.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-07-10 16:13:04mgiucasetspambayes_score: 0.00124172 -> 0.0012417234
recipients: + mgiuca, loewis, orsenthil, thomaspinckney3
2008-07-10 16:13:04mgiucasetspambayes_score: 0.00124172 -> 0.00124172
messageid: <1215706384.14.0.192659013615.issue3300@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-07-10 16:13:03mgiucalinkissue3300 messages
2008-07-10 16:13:03mgiucacreate