This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2008-06-28.20:11:58
SpamBayes Score 0.00013642291
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1214683920.0.0.448485902593.issue3081@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
-1 on the new macros.  The mnemonic doesn't work for me and the example 
code fragments are to my eyes less readable than before.  These add to 
the learning curve for reading and writing C extensions and provide 
nearly zero benefits.  

Assigning from an INCREF feels weird.  It is somewhat at odds with our 
coding style where we tend to stick with dirt simple C, trying to put 
operations on different lines rather than combining too many step in a 
single line.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-06-28 20:12:00rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.000136423 -> 0.00013642291
recipients: + rhettinger, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson
2008-06-28 20:12:00rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.000136423 -> 0.000136423
messageid: <1214683920.0.0.448485902593.issue3081@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-06-28 20:11:59rhettingerlinkissue3081 messages
2008-06-28 20:11:58rhettingercreate