Message 66519 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nbm
Recipients	christian.heimes, exarkun, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, nbm, smurfix
Date	2008-05-10.13:38:14
SpamBayes Score	0.07826511
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1210426697.43.0.159883773195.issue2722@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
This affects OS X too. I'm attaching two patches - one uses malloc to build a bigger string if the existing implementation returns ERANGE, and the other one uses malloc from the start. This was done on the theory that stack memory use would be better/more efficient. However, based on testing, there's no real difference - 16.8usec vs. 17usec - on a rarely-used function.

This affects OS X too.

I'm attaching two patches - one uses malloc to build a bigger string if
the existing implementation returns ERANGE, and the other one uses
malloc from the start.  This was done on the theory that stack memory
use would be better/more efficient.  However, based on testing, there's
no real difference - 16.8usec vs. 17usec - on a rarely-used function.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-05-10 13:38:18	nbm	set	spambayes_score: 0.0782651 -> 0.07826511 recipients: + nbm, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, smurfix
2008-05-10 13:38:17	nbm	set	spambayes_score: 0.0782651 -> 0.0782651 messageid: <1210426697.43.0.159883773195.issue2722@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-05-10 13:38:16	nbm	link	issue2722 messages
2008-05-10 13:38:15	nbm	create