Author pitrou
Recipients arigo, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jyasskin, lauromoura, nnorwitz, phsilva, pitrou
Date 2008-04-30.21:46:18
SpamBayes Score 0.216525
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1209591992.34.0.871494414841.issue2459@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Finally I had to slightly change the lnotab format to have the right
tracing semantics: the change is that line number increments are now
signed bytes rather than unsigned.

Still, there is a small change in tracing behaviour (see test_trace.py):
the for statement is traced twice in the first loop iteration, that's
because the iterator object is retrieved (GET_ITER) at the beginning of
the loop while the next iterator value is fetched (FOR_ITER) at the end
of the loop. I don't believe this is very painful.

All in all, the whole test suite now passes fine. The performance
numbers are the same as before.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-30 21:46:33pitrousetspambayes_score: 0.216525 -> 0.216525
recipients: + pitrou, nnorwitz, arigo, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jyasskin, lauromoura, phsilva
2008-04-30 21:46:32pitrousetspambayes_score: 0.216525 -> 0.216525
messageid: <1209591992.34.0.871494414841.issue2459@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-30 21:46:31pitroulinkissue2459 messages
2008-04-30 21:46:30pitroucreate