Message 64193 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eric.smith
Recipients	eric.smith
Date	2008-03-20.19:08:18
SpamBayes Score	0.49962807
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1206040099.45.0.826679091629.issue2436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Should this be accepted in 3.0, and become a no-op: from __future__ import print_function ? It might make using code in 2.6 and 3.0 easier, since you would not have to delete this line. I note that: from __future__ import with_statement is already valid in 3.0.

Should this be accepted in 3.0, and become a no-op:
from __future__ import print_function
?

It might make using code in 2.6 and 3.0 easier, since you would not have
to delete this line.

I note that:
from __future__ import with_statement
is already valid in 3.0.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-03-20 19:08:19	eric.smith	set	spambayes_score: 0.499628 -> 0.49962807 recipients: + eric.smith
2008-03-20 19:08:19	eric.smith	set	spambayes_score: 0.499628 -> 0.499628 messageid: <1206040099.45.0.826679091629.issue2436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-03-20 19:08:18	eric.smith	link	issue2436 messages
2008-03-20 19:08:18	eric.smith	create