Message 64066 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	Rhamphoryncus
Recipients	Rhamphoryncus, belopolsky, duncanb, facundobatista, terry.reedy
Date	2008-03-19.16:19:49
SpamBayes Score	0.015588567
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1205943590.53.0.531357089518.issue2417@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
The original bug is not whether or not python reuses int objects, but rather that an existing optimization disappears under certain circumstances. Something is breaking our optimization. The later cases where the optimization is simply gone in 3.0a3 are more difficult. We don't have to keep them.. but we probably want them. The small int reuse happens for a reason.

The original bug is not whether or not python reuses int objects, but
rather that an existing optimization disappears under certain
circumstances.  Something is breaking our optimization.

The later cases where the optimization is simply gone in 3.0a3 are more
difficult.  We don't *have* to keep them.. but we probably want them. 
The small int reuse happens for a reason.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-03-19 16:19:50	Rhamphoryncus	set	spambayes_score: 0.0155886 -> 0.015588567 recipients: + Rhamphoryncus, duncanb, terry.reedy, facundobatista, belopolsky
2008-03-19 16:19:50	Rhamphoryncus	set	spambayes_score: 0.0155886 -> 0.0155886 messageid: <1205943590.53.0.531357089518.issue2417@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-03-19 16:19:49	Rhamphoryncus	link	issue2417 messages
2008-03-19 16:19:49	Rhamphoryncus	create