Message 62305 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jyasskin
Recipients	facundobatista, gvanrossum, jyasskin, mark.dickinson, rhettinger
Date	2008-02-12.04:28:44
SpamBayes Score	0.0021093634
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1202790526.49.0.896977467961.issue1682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Re convergents: In the interest of minimality, I don't think from_continued_fraction and to_continued_fraction need to stick around. I think the other thread established pretty conclusively that .convergents() is not a particularly good building block for either nearby-fraction method, so I'd let people who want it implement it themselves. Neal Norwitz suggested and I agree that .trim() isn't descriptive enough, so let's follow Raymond's alternative of .limit_denominator(). Would you like to commit your implementation?

Re convergents: In the interest of minimality, I don't think
from_continued_fraction and to_continued_fraction need to stick around.
 I think the other thread established pretty conclusively that
.convergents() is not a particularly good building block for either
nearby-fraction method, so I'd let people who want it implement it
themselves. Neal Norwitz suggested and I agree that .trim() isn't
descriptive enough, so let's follow Raymond's alternative of
.limit_denominator(). Would you like to commit your implementation?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-02-12 04:28:47	jyasskin	set	spambayes_score: 0.00210936 -> 0.0021093634 recipients: + jyasskin, gvanrossum, rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson
2008-02-12 04:28:46	jyasskin	set	spambayes_score: 0.00210936 -> 0.00210936 messageid: <1202790526.49.0.896977467961.issue1682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-12 04:28:45	jyasskin	link	issue1682 messages
2008-02-12 04:28:44	jyasskin	create