This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author cjwatson
Recipients cjwatson, georg.brandl
Date 2008-02-01.09:41:05
SpamBayes Score 0.00746322
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1201858868.12.0.291898960418.issue1652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
To be quite honest I can't think of any incompatibilities that wouldn't
have the basic result of improving matters. I put the migration stuff in
my bug report in case somebody else could, because I don't want the bug
fix to stall on that.

My preference would be for Python to move to behaviour equivalent to
restore_sigpipe=True in the next release, but I would rather that it
gained restore_sigpipe with the wrong default than that it didn't gain
it at all.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-02-01 09:41:08cjwatsonsetspambayes_score: 0.00746322 -> 0.00746322
recipients: + cjwatson, georg.brandl
2008-02-01 09:41:08cjwatsonsetspambayes_score: 0.00746322 -> 0.00746322
messageid: <1201858868.12.0.291898960418.issue1652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-01 09:41:06cjwatsonlinkissue1652 messages
2008-02-01 09:41:05cjwatsoncreate