Author loewis
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, christian.heimes, donmez, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis
Date 2008-01-11.08:43:37
SpamBayes Score 0.101049
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <47872C36.3060309@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1200021990.16.0.977254088313.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> FWIW gcc hacker Ian Lance Taylor has a nice article about signed
> overflow optimizations in gcc, see http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/120
> . Reading that it might be better to use -fno-strict-overflow instead of
> -fwrapv.

Please be specific. I read it, and I don't think it's better to use
-fno-strict-overflow.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-01-11 08:43:38loewissetspambayes_score: 0.101049 -> 0.101049
recipients: + loewis, gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, christian.heimes, alexandre.vassalotti, donmez
2008-01-11 08:43:37loewislinkissue1621 messages
2008-01-11 08:43:37loewiscreate