Message5952
Logged In: YES
user_id=31392
I think this feature is more trouble than it's worth. If
a testrunner wants to capture the actual exception, it
could easily override the addError or addFailure method to
get the traceback then.
The cost of the feature is high, particularly since it is
not used by anyone. The effects of preserving tracebacks
can be hard to discern, and I expect when it happens it
will cause a lot of confusion. In my case, two experienced
Python programmers, who are novices with unittest, spent
several hours trying to figure out what went wrong.
I don't think updating the docs will be particularly
helpful, because this situation is somewhat unusual and
the current behavior so surprising.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 13:55:46 | admin | link | issue451309 messages |
2007-08-23 13:55:46 | admin | create | |
|