This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients christian.heimes, gvanrossum, nascheme, noam, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date 2007-12-17.22:56:49
SpamBayes Score 0.28320765
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
This is what I was thinking of before, although I'd use "%.16g"%f and
"%.17g"%f instead of str(f) and repr(f), and I'd use float() instead
of eval().

I suspect that it doesn't satisfy Tim Peters though, because this may
depend on a rounding bug in the local platform's input function.
Date User Action Args
2007-12-17 22:56:50gvanrossumsetspambayes_score: 0.283208 -> 0.28320765
recipients: + gvanrossum, tim.peters, nascheme, rhettinger, christian.heimes, noam
2007-12-17 22:56:49gvanrossumlinkissue1580 messages
2007-12-17 22:56:49gvanrossumcreate