This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author janssen
Recipients christian.heimes, gvanrossum, janssen
Date 2007-12-07.23:52:36
SpamBayes Score 0.00025855942
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4b3e516a0712071552j47d0e873n2c2118bfd3652ae1@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <4758513A.20003@cheimes.de>
Content
I'm still not sure what the problem is.  This code was working fine when I
committed it, no leaks, so something else must have changed under the
covers.  I don't believe that adding GC to the C code is the answer; it
should be automatically GC'd.  So I'd back that patch out.

I intend to wolf-fence the tests in the test module until I find a single
test that causes the leaks.  Sorry I haven't had time to look at this
earlier, but we're in the middle of a big presentation afternoon here at
work.

On Dec 6, 2007 11:45 AM, Christian Heimes <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Christian Heimes added the comment:
>
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I just reverted it. I put a bit of debugging in the call to
> > _real_close(), and even with Christian's corrections it fails miserably.
> > I prefer leaking.
>
> I agree! I've not enough time to work on the patch. A working patch
> requires some redesign of the ssl interface. It's definitely too late now.
>
> Christian
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1469>
> __________________________________
>
Files
File name Uploaded
unnamed janssen, 2007-12-07.23:52:35
History
Date User Action Args
2007-12-07 23:52:36janssensetspambayes_score: 0.000258559 -> 0.00025855942
recipients: + janssen, gvanrossum, christian.heimes
2007-12-07 23:52:36janssenlinkissue1469 messages
2007-12-07 23:52:36janssencreate