Message 57962 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	amaury.forgeotdarc
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, doerwalter, eisele
Date	2007-11-29.22:56:16
SpamBayes Score	0.0049640313
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1196376976.73.0.395904051108.issue1521@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Here is a patch, with a unit test (I was surprised that test_bigmem.py already contained a test_decode function, which was left empty). But I still don't have access to any 64bit machine. Can someone try and see if the new tests in test_bigmem.py fail, and that the patch in getargs.c corrects the problem?

Here is a patch, with a unit test (I was surprised that test_bigmem.py
already contained a test_decode function, which was left empty).

But I still don't have access to any 64bit machine.
Can someone try and see if the new tests in test_bigmem.py fail, and
that the patch in getargs.c corrects the problem?

Files
File name	Uploaded
getargs.patch	amaury.forgeotdarc, 2007-11-29.22:56:16

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-11-29 22:56:17	amaury.forgeotdarc	set	spambayes_score: 0.00496403 -> 0.0049640313 recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, doerwalter, eisele
2007-11-29 22:56:16	amaury.forgeotdarc	set	spambayes_score: 0.00496403 -> 0.00496403 messageid: <1196376976.73.0.395904051108.issue1521@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-11-29 22:56:16	amaury.forgeotdarc	link	issue1521 messages
2007-11-29 22:56:16	amaury.forgeotdarc	create