This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author skip.montanaro
Recipients guettli, jribbens, skip.montanaro, tim.peters, tomster
Date 2007-11-02.16:55:24
SpamBayes Score 0.09548189
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
>> No fractions of a second...

    Jon> If we're expecting floating-point, then everything you said earlier
    Jon> about the limitations of ints was a bit redundant ;-)

Yes, sorry.  I responded to the mail without going back and reviewing the
entire thread.  (It's been a couple months.)  Note however that my example
to_timestamp() function converts the microseconds field to seconds and
include them in the result.

So, are we concluding that nothing needs to be added to the datetime module?

Date User Action Args
2007-11-02 16:55:24skip.montanarosetspambayes_score: 0.0954819 -> 0.09548189
recipients: + skip.montanaro, tim.peters, jribbens, guettli, tomster
2007-11-02 16:55:24skip.montanarolinkissue1673409 messages
2007-11-02 16:55:24skip.montanarocreate