Message 57057 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	skip.montanaro
Recipients	guettli, jribbens, skip.montanaro, tim.peters, tomster
Date	2007-11-02.16:55:24
SpamBayes Score	0.0954819
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<18219.22105.588043.636156@montanaro.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to	<1194018696.59.0.4301690798.issue1673409@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
>> No fractions of a second... Jon> If we're expecting floating-point, then everything you said earlier Jon> about the limitations of ints was a bit redundant ;-) Yes, sorry. I responded to the mail without going back and reviewing the entire thread. (It's been a couple months.) Note however that my example to_timestamp() function converts the microseconds field to seconds and include them in the result. So, are we concluding that nothing needs to be added to the datetime module? Skip

>> No fractions of a second...

    Jon> If we're expecting floating-point, then everything you said earlier
    Jon> about the limitations of ints was a bit redundant ;-)

Yes, sorry.  I responded to the mail without going back and reviewing the
entire thread.  (It's been a couple months.)  Note however that my example
to_timestamp() function converts the microseconds field to seconds and
include them in the result.

So, are we concluding that nothing needs to be added to the datetime module?

Skip

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-11-02 16:55:24	skip.montanaro	set	spambayes_score: 0.0954819 -> 0.0954819 recipients: + skip.montanaro, tim.peters, jribbens, guettli, tomster
2007-11-02 16:55:24	skip.montanaro	link	issue1673409 messages
2007-11-02 16:55:24	skip.montanaro	create