Message53141
Logged In: YES
user_id=38376
I'm not sure this is a bug -- imo, you're relying on
an implementation artifact in the original PCRE port.
And making this work under SRE isn't as easy as it may
appear (the proposed patch may work in your specific
case, but it isn't a general solution).
But before I make up my mind here, maybe you could tell
me why you think it's a good idea to use deepcopy on
match objects. Why not just store "m.groups()" or
"m.regs" instead?
Cheers /F |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 16:01:07 | admin | link | issue416670 messages |
2007-08-23 16:01:07 | admin | create | |
|