Message 52488 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	loewis
Recipients
Date	2007-04-26.08:06:00
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
AFAICT, MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED is not needed to fix 1693753. If the objective of this patch is to establish consistency across platforms, then this should not be added, since os.rename won't rename across volumes on Unix, either. So I'm also -1 on the patch in this form. jorend: would you still object if it only did MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING?

AFAICT, MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED is not needed to fix 1693753. If the objective of this patch is to establish consistency across platforms, then this should *not* be added, since os.rename won't rename across volumes on Unix, either. So I'm also -1 on the patch in this form.

jorend: would you still object if it only did MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 15:58:09	admin	link	issue1704547 messages
2007-08-23 15:58:09	admin	create