➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients gvanrossum, maggyero, rhettinger
Date 2022-04-05.04:33:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1649133207.55.0.863087439062.issue44090@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> any objections before I propose the removal of one-argument super?

AFAICT there is nothing to be gained by deprecating the one argument form.  Because it has been stable API for two decades, removing it is guaranteed to cause some disruption. So why bother?

Anthony Sottile provided this search to showing that at least a few popular projects are using the one argument form of super():

https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+%5Cbsuper%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5C%28%5C%29%5Cn%5D%2B%5C%29+file:.py%24&patternType=regexp&case=yes
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-05 04:33:27rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, gvanrossum, maggyero
2022-04-05 04:33:27rhettingersetmessageid: <1649133207.55.0.863087439062.issue44090@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-04-05 04:33:27rhettingerlinkissue44090 messages
2022-04-05 04:33:27rhettingercreate