Message412813
> Your suggested signature looks like it's trying to support
> the second invariant, but it doesn't quite: if the types
> don't match, the type checker will just set T to the
> common base type of the two arguments.
Is there a way to write the second invariant correctly? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-02-08 05:25:38 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, gvanrossum, JelleZijlstra |
2022-02-08 05:25:38 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1644297938.1.0.192506090226.issue46669@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2022-02-08 05:25:38 | rhettinger | link | issue46669 messages |
2022-02-08 05:25:38 | rhettinger | create | |
|