➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author GBeauregard
Recipients AlexWaygood, GBeauregard, Gobot1234, JelleZijlstra, gvanrossum, kj, levkivskyi, serhiy.storchaka, sobolevn
Date 2022-02-06.17:59:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1644170349.93.0.108632490881.issue46644@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
List[42] is already accepted, and your proposed patch does not change it to make it not accepted. The issue is _type_check is only called in a few particular locations; this is part of the technical reason I'm not very concerned about relaxing the _type_check requirements.

From a type checking philosophy point of view I agree with Jelle and am negative on strict runtime requirements in typing.py.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-02-06 17:59:09GBeauregardsetrecipients: + GBeauregard, gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi, JelleZijlstra, sobolevn, Gobot1234, kj, AlexWaygood
2022-02-06 17:59:09GBeauregardsetmessageid: <1644170349.93.0.108632490881.issue46644@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-02-06 17:59:09GBeauregardlinkissue46644 messages
2022-02-06 17:59:09GBeauregardcreate