Message412530
I think the incorrect qualification should be dropped, if sanely feasible.
More misleading are hidden positional-only args. Doc:
min(iterable, *[, key, default])
min(arg1, arg2, *args[, key])
>>> min(iterator=(1,3))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#0>", line 1, in <module>
min(iterator=(1,3))
TypeError: min expected at least 1 argument, got 0
1 was passed, but 0 were gotten, as the 1 passed was silently ignored. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-02-04 20:15:08 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, eric.smith, aroberge, Anders.Hovmöller |
2022-02-04 20:15:08 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1644005708.0.0.36748102601.issue46637@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2022-02-04 20:15:07 | terry.reedy | link | issue46637 messages |
2022-02-04 20:15:07 | terry.reedy | create | |
|