➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author AlexWaygood
Recipients AlexWaygood, JelleZijlstra, gvanrossum, kj, sobolevn
Date 2022-01-29.14:24:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1643466242.23.0.488244036231.issue46571@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
...Option 3). Deprecate @no_type_check?

Maybe we should gather some stats on how many people are using @no_type_check? My feeling is that it's never achieved widespread adoption, so maybe it's just not that useful a thing to have in the stdlib.

Anyway, the behaviour you've pointed out is nuts, so I agree that something needs to change here!
History
Date User Action Args
2022-01-29 14:24:02AlexWaygoodsetrecipients: + AlexWaygood, gvanrossum, JelleZijlstra, sobolevn, kj
2022-01-29 14:24:02AlexWaygoodsetmessageid: <1643466242.23.0.488244036231.issue46571@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-01-29 14:24:02AlexWaygoodlinkissue46571 messages
2022-01-29 14:24:02AlexWaygoodcreate