➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author n_rosenstein
Recipients BTaskaya, eric.smith, gvanrossum, joperez, kj, levkivskyi, lukasz.langa, miss-islington, n_rosenstein
Date 2022-01-07.15:17:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1641568639.76.0.556379848031.issue41370@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
I'm running into this issue right now. Can anyone provide a rationale as to why you think this is acceptable/expected behaviour? Do we expect developers to semi-rely on get_type_hints(), but than still having to manually resolve forward references in PEP585 generic aliases? That seems broken to me.

Thanks,
Niklas R.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-01-07 15:17:19n_rosensteinsetrecipients: + n_rosenstein, gvanrossum, eric.smith, lukasz.langa, levkivskyi, miss-islington, BTaskaya, joperez, kj
2022-01-07 15:17:19n_rosensteinsetmessageid: <1641568639.76.0.556379848031.issue41370@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-01-07 15:17:19n_rosensteinlinkissue41370 messages
2022-01-07 15:17:19n_rosensteincreate