Message409904
I don't want to belabor this, but hey, it's in f-strings! And if it's an actual problem I'd like to fix it.
> It can be uninitialized if the parenstack[nested_depth] value is itself initialized, which can happen if the memory block pointed by parenstack has not been initialized to some value after malloc'ed and parenstack[nested_depth] never got a value.
parenstack is allocated on the stack, not that that changes the discussion much.
It looks like everywhere that parenstack[nested_depth] is read, it's already been written to.
Anyway, (if I'm right,) this makes my points that a) there are false positives, and b) we should have separate issues for each actual problem. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-01-06 19:36:52 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, rhettinger, zach.ware, pablogsal, nanjekyejoannah |
2022-01-06 19:36:52 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1641497812.1.0.00056280147566.issue46280@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2022-01-06 19:36:52 | eric.smith | link | issue46280 messages |
2022-01-06 19:36:52 | eric.smith | create | |
|