This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author brandtbucher
Recipients Mark.Shannon, brandtbucher, gvanrossum, jmadden, pablogsal
Date 2021-12-23.01:06:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1640221611.64.0.581158416731.issue46090@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
After further discussion with the team this morning, we decided that the proposed "dummy chunk" workaround is unacceptable (the interpreter may end up trying free it when shutting down a thread).

Allowing the tstate->datastack_* members to be NULL is very easy on our end, and even simplifies thread creation a tad (since we can defer the allocation of the datastack until the first frame is actually needed).

I'll have a PR up in a few minutes.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-12-23 01:06:51brandtbuchersetrecipients: + brandtbucher, gvanrossum, Mark.Shannon, jmadden, pablogsal
2021-12-23 01:06:51brandtbuchersetmessageid: <1640221611.64.0.581158416731.issue46090@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-12-23 01:06:51brandtbucherlinkissue46090 messages
2021-12-23 01:06:51brandtbuchercreate