Message 40719 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nnorwitz
Recipients
Date	2002-08-29.20:05:12
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 The test doesn't need to import pprint or os. I'd like to see RETURN_NONE removed, it seemed like a hack, and if it's not necessary... Unrelated to the changes in the patch, could/should the PyStrring_AsString and _Size be changed to the macro versions? The return values aren't checked and it should be faster. Although this code is only executed when tracing.

Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

The test doesn't need to import pprint or os.
I'd like to see RETURN_NONE removed, it seemed like a hack,
and if it's not necessary...

Unrelated to the changes in the patch, could/should the
PyStrring_AsString and _Size be changed to the macro
versions?  The return values aren't checked and it should be
faster.  Although this code is only executed when tracing.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 15:14:20	admin	link	issue587993 messages
2007-08-23 15:14:20	admin	create