This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author hroncok
Recipients FFY00, gaborjbernat, hroncok, jaraco
Date 2021-10-08.18:01:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1633716106.78.0.420963607366.issue45413@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
The existing install schemes contain values for all different kinds of OSes, somehow named according to them.

If we introduce a single "virtual"/"venv" scheme, it would need to have different contents on different OSes (e.g. Windows vs POSIX). I don't think that would cause any actual trouble, but it would be somewhat different than all the other schemes.

If we introduce multiple ones (e.g. "posix_venv" and "nt_venv") we would need an additional layer to get the one appropriate for the current platform.

Hence, I think having a single one is more pragmatic.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-10-08 18:01:46hroncoksetrecipients: + hroncok, jaraco, gaborjbernat, FFY00
2021-10-08 18:01:46hroncoksetmessageid: <1633716106.78.0.420963607366.issue45413@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-10-08 18:01:46hroncoklinkissue45413 messages
2021-10-08 18:01:46hroncokcreate