Author steve.dower
Recipients Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, Christian.Tismer, Robin.Schreiber, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, haberman2, jcea, jhaberman, lekma, loewis, mattip, petr.viktorin, pitrou, seberg, steve.dower
Date 2021-09-27.17:05:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1632762352.85.0.174960105427.issue15870@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> As a tangential point, I think that the DLL case on Windows may be a case where Windows is not compliant with the C standard

I wasn't aware the C standard covered dynamic symbol resolution? "static" anything in C is completely irrelevant to how symbols are looked up and resolved between modules, and how addresses are relocated in PE binaries, by the Windows loader.

So this point isn't even tangential - it's nowhere near the surface ;)
History
Date User Action Args
2021-09-27 17:05:52steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, loewis, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, Arfrever, petr.viktorin, lekma, Alexander.Belopolsky, mattip, Robin.Schreiber, seberg, Christian.Tismer, jhaberman, haberman2
2021-09-27 17:05:52steve.dowersetmessageid: <1632762352.85.0.174960105427.issue15870@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-09-27 17:05:52steve.dowerlinkissue15870 messages
2021-09-27 17:05:52steve.dowercreate