This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author graingert
Recipients docs@python, graingert, jack__d, lukasz.langa, mark.dickinson, miss-islington, orsenthil, terry.reedy
Date 2021-08-18.20:42:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
Depends on the redirect type they create. If it's temporary we should keep
the same URL, if it's permanent or otherwise has bookmark updating
semantics we should update the URL to follow the redirect

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021, 21:40 Jack DeVries, <> wrote:

> Jack DeVries <> added the comment:
> All right, consider the needle in the haystack officially found. This page
> has the same content as the missing page:
> Thank you @buhtz for opening an issue with Mozilla; they are eventually
> going to deploy a redirect to the link above from the old link:
> So, we could go ahead and insert the link above which contains the same
> content as before. Or, we can keep the call open for a new document. What
> does everyone think?
> ----------
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <>
> <>
> _______________________________________
Date User Action Args
2021-08-18 20:42:18graingertsetrecipients: + graingert, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, orsenthil, docs@python, lukasz.langa, miss-islington, jack__d
2021-08-18 20:42:18graingertlinkissue44830 messages
2021-08-18 20:42:17graingertcreate