Author mark.dickinson
Recipients gregory.p.smith, lukasz.langa, mark.dickinson, miss-islington, pablogsal, seberg, tim.peters, twouters
Date 2021-08-15.10:00:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1629021659.13.0.69642079718.issue44698@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
@Pablo: I'm adding you to the nosy list to get your opinion on whether (the backport of) GH-27772 can go into 3.10.0.rc2.

Summary: GH-27278 (which I reviewed and approved) and its backports fixed some undefined behaviour in complex exponentiation, but also introduced a behaviour change that affected NumPy: some exponentiation expressions that returned a result in 3.10.0b4 raise an OverflowError in 3.10.0.rc1.

GH-27772 reverts the behaviour change but keeps the fix for the undefined behaviour. Can the backport of GH-27772 to the 3.10 branch go in before 3.10.0 final?
History
Date User Action Args
2021-08-15 10:00:59mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, twouters, gregory.p.smith, lukasz.langa, seberg, pablogsal, miss-islington
2021-08-15 10:00:59mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1629021659.13.0.69642079718.issue44698@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-08-15 10:00:59mark.dickinsonlinkissue44698 messages
2021-08-15 10:00:58mark.dickinsoncreate