Message399610
@Pablo: I'm adding you to the nosy list to get your opinion on whether (the backport of) GH-27772 can go into 3.10.0.rc2.
Summary: GH-27278 (which I reviewed and approved) and its backports fixed some undefined behaviour in complex exponentiation, but also introduced a behaviour change that affected NumPy: some exponentiation expressions that returned a result in 3.10.0b4 raise an OverflowError in 3.10.0.rc1.
GH-27772 reverts the behaviour change but keeps the fix for the undefined behaviour. Can the backport of GH-27772 to the 3.10 branch go in before 3.10.0 final? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-08-15 10:00:59 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, tim.peters, twouters, gregory.p.smith, lukasz.langa, seberg, pablogsal, miss-islington |
2021-08-15 10:00:59 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1629021659.13.0.69642079718.issue44698@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-08-15 10:00:59 | mark.dickinson | link | issue44698 messages |
2021-08-15 10:00:58 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|