(note the actual relevant code is in posixmodule.c) 

os.stat() error can be confusing and misleading when given an fd and with follow_symlinks=False:

ValueError: stat: cannot use fd and follow_symlinks together

It's less bad when os.stat() is used directly because the user would look at the signature and would have provided the follow_symlinks=False directly, but it's confusing when used indirectly by other function.

I've ran into this when reviewing https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27524

list(os.fwalk(1))
/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/os.py in fwalk(top, topdown, onerror, follow_symlinks, dir_fd)
    467         # lstat()/open()/fstat() trick.
    468         if not follow_symlinks:
--> 469             orig_st = stat(top, follow_symlinks=False, dir_fd=dir_fd)
    470         topfd = open(top, O_RDONLY, dir_fd=dir_fd)
    471         try:

ValueError: stat: cannot use fd and follow_symlinks together

----
A few things are confusing here: I did not use follow_symlinks argument; I can see from traceback that the arg is used but set to False, which is the usual meaning of "do not use follow_symlinks".

In addition, fwalk() can probably check that `top` arg is a string and raise an error stating that it should be a string if it's not.

If that's done, this issue will no longer happen for current code anywhere in os module, but stat(follow_symlinks=False) is also used in shutil and pathlib (I didn't check if fd may be passed in those cases), but also in 3rd party libraries.

So I think it would be clearer to rephrase the error to say

stat: cannot use fd and follow_symlinks set to False or NULL together

(adding NULL as it may be used from C code).