Message 398300 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	gvanrossum, kj, levkivskyi, miss-islington, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2021-07-27.14:17:59
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1627395479.39.0.977918486705.issue44098@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Yeah, but we shouldn't go out of our way to reject it. Especially since in 3.11 we'll likely have something equivalent to PEP 563 or PEP 649 (the SC is thinking deep about this right now) and either of those means that usually it won't be evaluated at all anyway (you'd have to call get_type_hints() with PEP 563, or use __annotations__ with the other).

Yeah, but we shouldn't go out of our way to reject it. Especially since in 3.11 we'll likely have something equivalent to PEP 563 or PEP 649 (the SC is thinking deep about this right now) and either of those means that usually it won't be evaluated at all anyway (you'd have to call get_type_hints() with PEP 563, or use __annotations__ with the other).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-07-27 14:17:59	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi, miss-islington, kj
2021-07-27 14:17:59	gvanrossum	set	messageid: <1627395479.39.0.977918486705.issue44098@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-07-27 14:17:59	gvanrossum	link	issue44098 messages
2021-07-27 14:17:59	gvanrossum	create