This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tlalexander
Recipients FFY00, p-ganssle, pablogsal, steven.daprano, theacodes, tlalexander, veky
Date 2021-07-13.01:58:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1626141510.8.0.243374835753.issue44603@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Am I correct in thinking that the proposed change only affects the use case where a user types exit in to the REPL and hits return? And that any other case is unaffected?

I can only imagine that the majority of users who type exit in to the interpreter are expecting the REPL to exit.

Stargirl do I recall you mentioning (perhaps on twitter) that there are threads online of users expressing frustration with this feature? It would be helpful to see what users have said about it.

I would push back against the idea that this is about laziness. It sounds like this is about reducing user confusion.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-07-13 01:58:30tlalexandersetrecipients: + tlalexander, steven.daprano, veky, p-ganssle, pablogsal, FFY00, theacodes
2021-07-13 01:58:30tlalexandersetmessageid: <1626141510.8.0.243374835753.issue44603@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-07-13 01:58:30tlalexanderlinkissue44603 messages
2021-07-13 01:58:30tlalexandercreate