Message 39490 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients
Date	2002-04-07.03:00:08
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 Here's a more fleshed-out implementation of D.pop(). It doesn't rely on popitem(), doesn't malloc a tuple, and the refcounts should be correct. One change from Neil's version, since k isn't being returned, then an arbitrary pair doesn't make sense, so the key argument to pop is required rather than optional. The diff is off of 2.123.

Logged In: YES 
user_id=80475

Here's a more fleshed-out implementation of D.pop(). It 
doesn't rely on popitem(), doesn't malloc a tuple, and the 
refcounts should be correct.

One change from Neil's version, since k isn't being 
returned, then an arbitrary pair doesn't make sense, so the 
key argument to pop is required rather than optional.

The diff is off of 2.123.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 15:12:05	admin	link	issue539949 messages
2007-08-23 15:12:05	admin	create