Message392565
+ Nick and Guido
The only benefit I see on our side is that it leaves the door open for complex assignment targets in the future, like (a, b), a[b], etc.
(If I recall correctly, this is also why NamedExpr uses an expr target rather than just an identifier.)
I guess I'm neutral on this. The usability argument seems weak, but I can see the separate case for forward-compatibility with possible syntax extensions in the future. Thoughts?
Marking as high priority since we need to make a decision on this before the beta. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-05-01 02:25:56 | brandtbucher | set | recipients:
+ brandtbucher, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, Anthony Sottile |
2021-05-01 02:25:56 | brandtbucher | set | messageid: <1619835956.01.0.916272419709.issue43994@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-05-01 02:25:55 | brandtbucher | link | issue43994 messages |
2021-05-01 02:25:55 | brandtbucher | create | |
|